Hi Sunitha, The bug is closed, it was fixed and released in juju 1.25.
There are some docs at the below link that summarise the behaviour: https://jujucharms.com/docs/1.25/reference-numbering If you'd like to have a talk about this I'd be very happy to. I'm mattyw on irc in #juju and #juju-dev (otherwise email is fine) Thanks Matty On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Sunitha Radharapu <sradh...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I am a little bit confused here, bug description says it should be as > unique id. If it is a bug and you are going to fix in future juju releases > then we no need to change our amulet tests. > > If it is a new feature then we will change our upcoming charms > accordingly, > > Thanks, > Sunitha. > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthew Williams ---13-11-2015 > 20:32:45---Hi Mark, Sunitha, My apologies, I should have included the]Matthew > Williams ---13-11-2015 20:32:45---Hi Mark, Sunitha, My apologies, I should > have included the explanation in the original email. > > From: Matthew Williams <matthew.willi...@canonical.com> > To: Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> > Cc: Sunitha Radharapu/India/IBM@IBMIN, Juju email list < > juju@lists.ubuntu.com> > Date: 13-11-2015 20:32 > Subject: Re: Unit number is increasing in latest juju version. > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi Mark, Sunitha, > > My apologies, I should have included the explanation in the original email. > > This was a change to address a long standing bug: > *https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610* > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1174610> > > There's a discussion in the bug report, but the summary is that in most > cases it's desirable to have the unit id be unique across the life of an > environment. Otherwise you loose the identity of a unit across relations. > > We were already numbering the machines in the same way, so this change > also gives us consistency between machine and unit numbering systems. > > Thanks > > Matty > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Mark Shuttleworth <*m...@ubuntu.com* > <m...@ubuntu.com>> wrote: > > > Thanks Sunitha. Matty, deeper question is - was this an intended change > in behaviour, and what's the rationale? > > Mark > > > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
