Im for it and the majority of my charm layers are py3 ready(ish). On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/issues/5 > > I am for using Python 3 in the base layer, but we need to address the > effect that would have on the charms currently written using layers. I > don't think the community effort to handle the switch at this point would > be large, but we could also fork the base layer have a "basic-py2" layer > for a period to ease the transition. > > Thoughts or concerns? > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju > >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
