Also there is a bzr library being utilized as well. Can we just extract these out into subprocess calls instead?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com > wrote: > On 17 November 2015 at 03:50, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote: > > https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/issues/5 > > > > I am for using Python 3 in the base layer, but we need to address the > effect > > that would have on the charms currently written using layers. I don't > think > > the community effort to handle the switch at this point would be large, > but > > we could also fork the base layer have a "basic-py2" layer for a period > to > > ease the transition. > > > > Thoughts or concerns? > > Right now with the new framework is the best opportunity we are ever > going to get. The alternative is supporting hacks allowing both Py2 > and Py3 until 2020 (but you know that, since I published one such hack > and recommended not merging it ;) ) > > I doubt there are any Py2 charms that cannot easily move, since the > oldest version they can target is 2.7. The only thing that comes to my > mind is git support, as IIRC charmhelpers is using an obsolete git > library and the functionality is unavailable with Py3. > > -- > Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com> > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
