Thanks again for the feedback, I'm going to cut and push this release of the Etcd charm and issue a follow up announcement to the list advising pinning/avoiding upgrade if end users wish to keep non-tls connections.
Cheers! On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:34 AM Jay Wren <jay.w...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Casey Marshall < > casey.marsh...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> The overhead of a TLS handshake can be minimal, it just depends on the >> algorithm & key lengths used. This should be configurable in the layer, I >> think. EC and 2048-bit RSA have reasonable handshake times. >> >> > I take it all back. I just had a chat with coworkers who reminded me that > etcd supports http2 already and that the performance improvements of http2 > could be very significant. Given that, I thank you greatly for these TLS > changes and look forward to using them > -- > Jay > -- Juju Charmer Canonical Group Ltd. Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
