processor    : 0
vendor_id    : GenuineIntel
cpu family    : 6
model        : 37
model name    : Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU        P6100  @ 2.00GHz
stepping    : 5
microcode    : 0x2
cpu MHz        : 933.000
cache size    : 3072 KB
physical id    : 0
siblings    : 2
core id        : 0
cpu cores    : 2
apicid        : 0
initial apicid    : 0
fpu        : yes
fpu_exception    : yes
cpuid level    : 11
wp        : yes
flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx
rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr
pdcm pcid popcnt lahf_lm arat dtherm
bogomips    : 3990.03
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment    : 64
address sizes    : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor    : 1
vendor_id    : GenuineIntel
cpu family    : 6
model        : 37
model name    : Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU        P6100  @ 2.00GHz
stepping    : 5
microcode    : 0x2
cpu MHz        : 1999.000
cache size    : 3072 KB
physical id    : 0
siblings    : 2
core id        : 2
cpu cores    : 2
apicid        : 4
initial apicid    : 4
fpu        : yes
fpu_exception    : yes
cpuid level    : 11
wp        : yes
flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx
rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology
nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr
pdcm pcid popcnt lahf_lm arat dtherm
bogomips    : 3990.03
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment    : 64
address sizes    : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:



On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jameson Nash <vtjn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think he mentioned this was a clean build, from scratch.
>
> Rajan, what's your processor? also try `make debug` and see if that
> prints anything more when in crashes
>
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Tim Holy <tim.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 26, 2014 11:16:24 AM Rajn wrote:
> >> Bump anyone? What does this mean? Next steps please?
> >
> > Have you tried "make clean; make"?
> > --Tim
> >
> >>
> >> osutils.jl
> >> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
> >> make[1]: *** [/home/rajan/julia/usr/lib/
> >> julia/sys0.bc] Error 132
> >> make: *** [release] Error 2
> >>
> >> On Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30:18 PM UTC-5, Rajn wrote:
> >> > After my several failed attempts to run PyPlot through Julia in
> Windows, I
> >> > decided to give up and try Linux.
> >> > Guess it was even worse.
> >> >
> >> > First I added to regular repository (not the nightlybuild)
> >> > then added the dep-repository
> >> > then updated and
> >> > then installed julia
> >> >
> >> > Here's the latest:
> >> > Unpacking librmath-dev (from
> >> > .../librmath-dev_2.15.2-juliadeps2~raring_amd64.deb) ...
> >> > dpkg: error processing
> >> >
> /var/cache/apt/archives/librmath-dev_2.15.2-juliadeps2~raring_amd64.deb
> >> >
> >> > (--unpack):
> >> >  trying to overwrite '/usr/include/Rmath.h', which is also in package
> >> >
> >> > r-mathlib 3.0.1-3ubuntu1
> >> > No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already
> >> >
> >> >
> Selecting
> >> >
> >> > previously unselected package julia.
> >> > Unpacking julia (from .../julia_0.2.0~saucyfinal1_amd64.deb) ...
> >> > Processing triggers for man-db ...
> >> >
> >> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >> >
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/librmath-dev_2.15.2-juliadeps2~raring_amd64.deb
> >> >
> >> > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> >> >
> >> > Have no clue absolutely how to proceed. The same issue occurs when I
> try
> >> > nightly builds.
>

Reply via email to