I should add that PEGParser's code is fairly new and untested (besides having an uninspired name). I'm also hoping to have better action semantics soon.
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 2:17:27 PM UTC-4, andrew cooke wrote: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/t56VxOX1vvk/nszQYWP_pm4J > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-users/6jz3Ow5SAAE/TgKHQ48gUG4J > > thanks! > > On Saturday, 31 May 2014 14:04:28 UTC-4, Isaiah wrote: >> >> There was a nice looking PEG system previewed a few days ago if you >> search the users list (and I think there was another one several months >> back by Michael Fox). >> >> >> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:22 PM, andrew cooke <and...@acooke.org> wrote: >> >>> are there any libraries for parsing in julia? either parser combinator >>> or something more traditional (maybe a wrapper for something like antlr)? >>> >>> all i can find is an old discussion started by leah h in which jeff b >>> suggests doing everything in julia. that included a pointer to >>> https://github.com/astrieanna/juliaparsec/blob/master/juliaparsec.jl >>> from dan l which is, well, as he says, rather basic. >>> >>> i'm not sure i agree, but i don't want to write my own combinator lib >>> either. >>> >>> i guess i'm looking for things like a clean separation between grammar >>> and implementation, support for errors with line numbers, speed, easy >>> debugging... >>> >>> andrew >>> >> >>
