What were you doing before that was different then?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Michael Louwrens < michael.w.louwr...@outlook.com> wrote: > No, just reporting the times found from the @time macro. > > On Sunday, 6 July 2014 12:25:58 UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > >> Were you timing the whole process execution, including system startup? >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Michael Louwrens <michael.w...@outlook. >> com> wrote: >> >>> Makes sense! >>> >>> Not sure why I did that in the 1st place. >>> >>> Interestingly, Julia gets 100ms if I simply use @time testFunction(), on >>> par with c++. >>> >>> Using >>> testFunction() >>> @time testFunction() >>> >>> To compile speeds it up to 57ms, the fastest of all the languages tested! >>> >> >>
