Aah! Yes, I 1st changed the variables to Float 64, then tested successive calls of the GA to see how well it performed.
On Monday, 7 July 2014 03:02:00 UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > This is the bit I was confused about: > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Michael Louwrens < > michael.w...@outlook.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Interestingly, Julia gets 100ms if I simply use @time testFunction(), on >> par with c++. >> >> Using >> testFunction() >> @time testFunction() >> >> To compile speeds it up to 57ms, the fastest of all the languages tested! >> > > "if I simply use @time testFunction()" implies to me that you were doing > something else before. I was wondering what that something else was. I'm > also confused about "To compile speeds it up to 57ms" – what does that > mean? How did you compile it? Julia always runs compiled code... >
