Dear Steven Thanks a lot
However CPC seems to be a bitssy and slow even if you submit fortran code. A colleague of mine spent 9 months until the editor was happy with the code. regards Moirtz On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 21:15:40 UTC+2, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:25:57 PM UTC-4, Isaiah wrote: >> >> If the work is "I translated Conventional Algorithm Foo into Julia" then >>> it probably wouldn't be that interesting >> >> >> There have been some pushes to create a peer-reviewed publication path >> for software that is not necessarily scientifically novel. I'm not familiar >> with any in computational physics, >> > > Computer Physics Communications ( > http://www.journals.elsevier.com/computer-physics-communications/) > publishes a lot of articles of this sort: papers that are more intended to > document free/open-source implementations than they are to describe novel > algorithms. > > This is quite useful as a way to give people something to cite when they > use your code, and also to obtain more traditional academic credit for > free-software work. >
