Dear Stefan Your words into the publishers/editors ears!
Of course I am quite happy with julia. regards Moritz On Wednesday, 15 October 2014 16:28:24 UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, moritz braun <moritz...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> However the standard journals will probably tell me, that this language >> is to "immature etc." >> > > Do you have any specific reason to think they will do this? I've never > heard of a journal saying anything about an author's choice of programming > language. For the scientific record, Julia already has a higher level of > reproducibility than commercial software. You can easily get a copy of the > exact version of Julia that was used in any experiment. You cannot, on the > other hand, get a copy of the specific version of Matlab that was used when > a paper was published – you can only hope that MathWorks hasn't changed > things in an incompatible way, which is not always the case. >
