Daniel: I think your hunch is probably correct; LT's internal architecture is very powerful and very flexible, but that comes at a cost of complexity which (for now at least) isn't hidden from the end user as well as it could be. It's interesting to hear that perspective on Sublime vs. Atom – I'll have to take a look at how configuration is handled in both.
Petr: You shouldn't need to connect to Julia explicitly, just `C-Enter` on something you want to evaluate and a client will boot up for you. If you've got the Juno plugin installed, a Julia client will boot up for you at start up which speeds things along. If you want to test this just try `C-N` for a new file and evaluate `2+2` or something simple like that, but opening up an existing file should work just as well. I'm working on a mini tutorial that should soften the learning curve here a bit. On 29 November 2014 at 17:48, Petr Krysl <krysl.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I installed LT and ran it on my toy Julia project. I tried to make the > connection to Julia, but I couldn't find it on the list. What do I do? > > Thanks, > > Petr > > On Saturday, November 29, 2014 7:30:05 AM UTC-8, Mike Innes wrote: >> >> One good reason to use Light Table is that it has pretty good support for >> using Julia interactively. Things like eval'ing the current code block in >> the editor, highlighting and linking to lines that cause errors, support >> for eval in modules, inline Gadfly plots etc. See here >> <http://junolab.org/> if you're interested. Plus, no one else supports >> highlighting for string interpolation, so far as I know ;) >> >>
