Yes, but I can't see that as an argument to showcase the threading capabilities. Whats wrong with that?
I common Julia thread pool is, by the way, an argument for Julia based BLAS at some point when the threading code matures. Am Samstag, 14. März 2015 18:26:25 UTC+1 schrieb Erik Schnetter: > > As long as linear algebra is handled by BLAS, using multi-threading in > Julia isn't really necessary. If the matrices are large enough to warrant > multithreading, then using a multi-threaded BLAS is usually more > efficient... > > -erik > > On Mar 13, 2015, at 16:54 , Tobias Knopp <tobias...@googlemail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > you can start with a simple matrix-vector or matrix-matrix product. > imfilter (Images.jl) is also a function that can benefit from > multithreading. > > > > Am Freitag, 13. März 2015 04:52:37 UTC+1 schrieb Viral Shah: > > I am looking to put together a set of use cases for our multi-threading > capabilities - mainly to push forward as well as a showcase. I am thinking > of starting with stuff in the microbenchmarks and the shootout > implementations that are already in test/perf. > > > > I am looking for other ideas that would be of interest. If there is real > interest, we can collect all of these in a repo in JuliaParallel. > > -- > Erik Schnetter <schn...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ > > My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting > and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from https://sks-keyservers.net. > > >
