It would seem that they must be forcing on codegen with -mattrs=+vfp, but I didn't think you could do that at compile time. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:14 AM Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote:
> :-( > > I wonder what’s the magic incantation those LLVM binaries use. > > -viral > > > > > On 31-May-2015, at 9:29 am, Seth <catch...@bromberger.com> wrote: > > > > Nope: > > > > error during bootstrap: > > LoadError(at "sysimg.jl" line 278: LoadError(at "constants.jl" line 94: > Base.AssertionError(msg="Float64(π) == Float64(big(π))"))) > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:30:49 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: > > Oh, ok - let me restart. > > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:29:50 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > Yes, those steps are good. Could you leave out the JULIA_CPU_ARCH for > now? > > > > -viral > > > > > > > > > On 30-May-2015, at 10:56 pm, Seth <catc...@bromberger.com> wrote: > > > > > > Oh, also export JULIA_CPU_ARCH=arm1176jzf-s. Build running now - will > report back in about 12 hours :) > > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:24:15 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: > > > On it. make distcleanall; git pull; make? > > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:23:05 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > > Could you guys try with the latest master, with a fresh clone? I am no > longer passing any flags to LLVM and also using LLVM 3.6.1. > > > > > > -viral > > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 7:18:41 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: > > > We need to figure out the magic they use to build those binaries. What > if you remove all LLVM flags in the Julia build in the arm section of > make.inc and let LLVM do it's thing? > > > > > > -viral > > > > > > On 29 May 2015 9:27 pm, "Daan Huybrechs" <daan.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On the other hand, building with the LLVM binaries from llvm.org does > still work on a Pi 2 to get a working REPL - I just tested that with > gcc-4.9 and LLVM 3.6.1 today. > > > > > > Daan > > > >
