Adding the export failed with the same error. error during bootstrap: LoadError(at "sysimg.jl" line 278: LoadError(at "constants.jl" line 94: Base.AssertionError(msg="Float64(π) == Float64(big(π))")))
On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 8:59:32 PM UTC-7, Seth wrote: > > Nope: > > error during bootstrap: > LoadError(at "sysimg.jl" line 278: LoadError(at "constants.jl" line 94: > Base.AssertionError(msg="Float64(π) == Float64(big(π))"))) > > > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:30:49 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: >> >> Oh, ok - let me restart. >> >> >> On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:29:50 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >>> >>> Yes, those steps are good. Could you leave out the JULIA_CPU_ARCH for >>> now? >>> >>> -viral >>> >>> >>> >>> > On 30-May-2015, at 10:56 pm, Seth <catc...@bromberger.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Oh, also export JULIA_CPU_ARCH=arm1176jzf-s. Build running now - will >>> report back in about 12 hours :) >>> > >>> > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:24:15 AM UTC-7, Seth wrote: >>> > On it. make distcleanall; git pull; make? >>> > >>> > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 10:23:05 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >>> > Could you guys try with the latest master, with a fresh clone? I am no >>> longer passing any flags to LLVM and also using LLVM 3.6.1. >>> > >>> > -viral >>> > >>> > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 7:18:41 AM UTC+5:30, Viral Shah wrote: >>> > We need to figure out the magic they use to build those binaries. What >>> if you remove all LLVM flags in the Julia build in the arm section of >>> make.inc and let LLVM do it's thing? >>> > >>> > -viral >>> > >>> > On 29 May 2015 9:27 pm, "Daan Huybrechs" <daan.hu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > On the other hand, building with the LLVM binaries from llvm.org does >>> still work on a Pi 2 to get a working REPL - I just tested that with >>> gcc-4.9 and LLVM 3.6.1 today. >>> > >>> > Daan >>> >>>
