Ahh that's a great distinction-- good catch. Knowing that I'd vote that the repo be named JuliaLang/atom-language-julia
// Spencer On June 11, 2015 at 9:49:28 PM MST, John Myles White <johnmyleswh...@gmail.com> wrote:Looking into this more, it looks like the repo can have any name you want. The important thing is that the package is named language-julia, not the repo.On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 8:05:20 PM UTC-7, Spencer Lyon wrote:Good to see something for atom-language-julia. That is what the package was named originally, but it wasn't maintained so it was forked and renamed language-julia. I don't think there will really be any reusable components. I just dont know another editor/tool that uses textmate style grammar in cson format or atom's snippet syntax, for example.