It doesn't, at least for me. ZMQ tests still segfault.

-- mb

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Tony Kelman <t...@kelman.net> wrote:

> 0.3.10 (released yesterday) should fix this error.
>
>
> On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 10:02:09 AM UTC-4, Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
>>
>> These issues may be relevant:
>>
>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/ZMQ.jl/issues/83
>>
>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/IJulia.jl/issues/323
>>
>>
>> -- mb
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Grigoriy Isaev <grigoriy...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that there is unfixed bug somewhere in Juno distribution.
>>> Latest 64 bit Juno is version 0.3.7 and it has this bug. If i install
>>> latest Julia 0.4.0 - zero MQ builds correctly and everything is fine with
>>> Ijulia notebooks using 0.4.0 version
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> четверг, 25 июня 2015 г., 16:32:33 UTC+3 пользователь Grigoriy Isaev
>>> написал:
>>>
>>>> Hi!  I am trying to set up  Ijulia. I've cleand my PC from all previuos
>>>> versions of Julia/Ipython and installed fresh 64 bit Anaconda 3 python
>>>> distribution + downloaded Juno 64 bit.
>>>>
>>>> After i launch Ipython i can see Ijulia option, but trying to create
>>>> notebooks i get "kernell has died" message and a ZMQ error reference.
>>>>
>>>> I can not re-build ZMQ on my PC, i get the following errors:
>>>>
>>>> =================================[ ERROR: ZMQ
>>>> ]=================================
>>>>
>>>> Provider PackageManager failed to satisfy dependency zmq
>>>> while loading C:\Users\Gisaev\.julia\v0.3\ZMQ\deps\build.jl, in
>>>> expression starting on line 23
>>>>
>>>> ================================[ BUILD ERRORS
>>>> ]================================
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: ZMQ had build errors.
>>>>
>>>>  - packages with build errors remain installed in
>>>> C:\Users\Gisaev\.julia\v0.3
>>>>  - build the package(s) and all dependencies with `Pkg.build("ZMQ")`
>>>>  - build a single package by running its `deps/build.jl` script
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tried Pkg.checkout on both ZMQ and Ijulia but to no avail. Ipython
>>>> notebooks work just fine.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on what might be the problem?
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to