I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state of JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have misread the year) He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, which were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something about it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing that, I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now looking for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, --- or am I ready for some coffee?
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of > the box? > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC <ismael...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? >> >> https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl >> >> El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff >> escribió: >>> >>> Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x? >>> >>> >
