They were split, but google hasn't quite caught up to it. And all the old issues are of course still there in the original HDF5 repository.
I don't remember the status of this at all. I hate to say it, but why don't you just try it out and see if it works? If not, please file an issue--- shouldn't be hard to fix. --Tim On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37:32 PM Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > I saw a note from Tim responding to a general question about the state of > JLD. At that time (I thought the date was recent, though I might have > misread the year) > He said everything works very well except for the 128 bit integers, which > were on hold until he could verify that the their sign bit ?something about > it? would behave properly under storing and retrieving. After seeing that, > I did not try. I don't have the page I saw here .. but just now looking > for that I was routed to HDF5.jl .. were they not split recently, > --- or am I ready for some coffee? > > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:45:13 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > JLD is built on top of HDF5. Jeffrey: does JLD not handle Int128 out of > > the box? > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Ismael VC <ismael...@gmail.com > > > > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Have you tried using it with HDF5.jl? > >> > >> https://github.com/timholy/HDF5.jl > >> > >> El miércoles, 19 de agosto de 2015, 12:50:35 (UTC-5), Jeffrey Sarnoff > >> > >> escribió: > >>> Or, what is a good approach to saving and reloading Int128s .. -x .. +x?
