On Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 9:21:47 AM UTC+2, Mauro wrote: > > >> This is the lowered and typed abstract syntax tree that you're seeing, > >> so two steps removed from what you've typed already (and another two > >> steps to go to get to machine code). Thus it gets more verbose. I > >> guess it would be nice to translate this typed code back to what you > >> wrote but with type annotations and display that. But that is not > >> possible (yet?). Have you seen this short and sweet JuliaCon > >> presentation by Jacob: > >> > >> > >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYZkHudRTvI&list=PLP8iPy9hna6Sdx4soiGrSefrmOPdUWixM&index=16 > > >> > > > > Yes, you worded better than I could: whether it is possible to get a > sort > > of breadth first view of the code. From the nice (and too short, thanks > for > > the link) presentation, it seems that this is not possible. Is there any > > hope that the "yet?" will become reality? I understand thought that this > > may be a request from somebody unable to read quickly the output of > > code_typed. > > If I understand correctly, this issue is requesting this feature > https://github.com/jakebolewski/JuliaParser.jl/issues/22 . By the sounds > of it, it's not going to happen tomorrow but maybe the day after. >
Just wow.
