I should add that it would still be useful if there was a Makefile to
install Julia system wide after extracting the tarball.

Bill.

On 9 December 2015 at 03:28, Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 9 December 2015 at 01:54, Tony Kelman <t...@kelman.net> wrote:
>
>> The PPA is maintained by staticfloat, aka Elliot Saba. He's had very
>> little time for Julia lately and no one has stepped up to take over the PPA
>> maintenance from him.
>>
>
> Thanks for letting me know. I'll circulate that and see if anyone locally
> wants to step up. You never know.
>
>
>>
>> You just extract the Linux tarballs, then run bin/julia. There's nothing
>> to install. If you want to have julia on your path, you can add it in your
>> bashrc.
>>
>
> Oh, that works for me now. Last time I tried it (quite some time ago now)
> it didn't. I figured the Ubuntu ppa's were there for a reason at the time,
> so didn't think much more of it.
>
> Bill.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 3:33:53 PM UTC-8, Bill Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way, I haven't used the generic Linux binaries because I couldn't
>>> figure out how to install them. There's no Makefile and no instructions.
>>> The last time I tried they didn't work when just placed in my home
>>> directory. They seem to need installation somewhere.
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure our Ubuntu users are going to prefer the ppa magic
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> On 9 December 2015 at 00:24, Bill Hart <goodwi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've searched my machine and really haven't found libjulia.so, except
>>>> the copy I mentioned, which has no symbols.
>>>>
>>>> The PPA's seemed to be very up-to-date with v0.4.1 being available the
>>>> day it was released. They also work just fine. I think they are just
>>>> missing something.
>>>>
>>>> Where would I even report that issue? Is it a Julia developer who
>>>> maintains the staticfloat ppa's?
>>>>
>>>> Bill.
>>>>
>>>> On 8 December 2015 at 23:46, Tony Kelman <to...@kelman.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That sounds like a serious bug in the PPA packaging, or it's just
>>>>> putting libjulia somewhere you haven't found it. The PPA is not very
>>>>> actively maintained at the moment, the generic tarball binaries are the
>>>>> main binary install recommendation on Linux right now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to