On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 6:17:14 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > The question is a legal question. This is* not* legal advice. > > I have not done this with any Julia code. I did do something similar some > years ago with other source code. > Understanding that permission may be contingent on an agreement to pay > money, the gist of it was: > > LICENCE: > For strictly non-commercial use, including education and research, the MIT > licence applies. >
This is incoherent — the MIT license does not limit licensees to non-commercial use. Effecitively, you are trying to use MIT license + an additional restriction (or minus some permissions), but written in a very confusing way. You are basically saying: "you can do anything with this code [MIT license], except that you can't." The general advice from most sources is: don't write your own license; the odds are high that you will mess up and say something whose effects are not what you intend.
