Mike and Tom, thanks! And yes, the other Mike needs mentioning too, I updated that footnote.
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 17:44, Michael Hatherly <michaelhathe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for writing that up Mauro and also the shout-out :) Worth noting > Mike Innes' important work in getting the docsystem integrated into `Base` > and his > heroic effort converting most of the docs from rst to markdown as well. > > On a technical note, Lexicon doesn't actually use the docsystem in `Base` > at all and still relies on Docile's own implementation currently, so it's > possible > that people may start to run into problems with this approach on 0.5 as it > further diverges from 0.3/0.4. (Do open issues if they happen to crop up > though and I'll do my best to keep things working as long as possible.) > Future work using the `Base` docsystem for documentation generation is > moving > ahead, when time allows, in a separate > package, https://github.com/MichaelHatherly/Lapidary.jl. > > -- Mike > > On Wednesday, 17 February 2016 17:13:38 UTC+2, Mauro wrote: >> >> Until a few days ago, I was a bit confused on how to go about writing >> nice package documentation, including API-docs. I figured it out and it >> turned out to be pretty trivial, once I knew how. I wrote it up in case >> someone else is confused (or I become confused again): >> http://maurow.bitbucket.org/notes/documenting-a-julia-package.html >> (feedback welcome) >> >> Mauro >>
