Hi,

Got this error using Power7: Linux abc.com 3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.ppc64 #1 SMP
Thu Jan 21 04:12:40 EST 2016 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 (Maipo)
--------------
make -C build/openblas-12ab1804b6ebcd38b26960d65d254314d8bc33d6/ CC=gcc
FC=gfortran RANLIB=ranlib FFLAGS= -O2 -fPIC TARGET= BINARY= USE_THREAD=1
GEMM_MULTITHREADING_THRESHOLD=50 NUM_THREADS=8 NO_AFFINITY=1 DYNAMIC_ARCH=1
MAKE_NB_JOBS=0
dynamic.c: In function ‘support_avx’:
dynamic.c:107:3: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘cpuid’
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
   ^
dynamic.c:97:3: error: impossible register constraint in ‘asm’
   __asm__ __volatile__
   ^
make[3]: *** [dynamic.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [libs] Error 1
\033[33;1m*** Clean the OpenBLAS build with 'make -C deps clean-openblas'.
Rebuild with 'make OPENBLAS_USE_THREAD=0' if OpenBLAS had trouble linking
libpthread.so, and with 'make OPENBLAS_TARGET_ARCH=NEHALEM' if there were
errors building SandyBridge support. Both these options can also be used
simultaneously. ***\033[0m
make[1]: ***
[build/openblas-12ab1804b6ebcd38b26960d65d254314d8bc33d6/libopenblas.so]
Error 1
make: *** [julia-deps] Error 2
----------------------

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Paulito Palmes <ppal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Viral,
>
> uname -a is:
> > Linux abc.com 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.ppc64le #1 SMP Fri Apr 8 05:10:45 EDT
> 2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
>
> and using Power8: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 (Maipo)
>
>
> Can you send me the tarball image of Julia compiled in Power8? I would
> like to test it if the problem is only during compilation. Since I have no
> git access on this machine, I used make -C deps getall to pull the deps
> before copying the source files to Power8. It may be possible the deps were
> not properly resolved?
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Viral Shah <vi...@mayin.org> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what to do here. Is the filesystem NFS or something? Perhaps
>> just try building again with make -j 1.
>>
>> What is uname -a?
>>
>> -viral
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2016 8:52 AM, "Paulito Palmes" <ppal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm compiling using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.2 in
>>> Power8 and I got this error:
>>>
>>> ./julia/usr/lib64/libunwind*.a: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> the make process didn't create usr/lib64 and the libunwind*.a are in
>>> usr/lib
>>>
>>> I created the links of libunwind*.a in usr/lib64
>>>
>>> but got these errors during compile:
>>>
>>> make[2]: Warning: File
>>> `/home/paulpalm/julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9/aclocal.m4' has
>>> modification time 293 s in the future
>>>
>>>  cd /home/paulpalm/julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9 && /bin/sh
>>> /home/paulpalm/julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9/build-aux/missing
>>> automake-1.15 --foreign
>>>
>>> /home/paulpalm/julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9/build-aux/missing: line
>>> 81: automake-1.15: command not found
>>>
>>> WARNING: 'automake-1.15' is missing on your system.
>>>
>>>          You should only need it if you modified 'Makefile.am' or
>>>
>>>          'configure.ac' or m4 files included by 'configure.ac'.
>>>
>>>          The 'automake' program is part of the GNU Automake package:
>>>
>>>          <http://www.gnu.org/software/automake>
>>>
>>>          It also requires GNU Autoconf, GNU m4 and Perl in order to run:
>>>
>>>          <http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf>
>>>
>>>          <http://www.gnu.org/software/m4/>
>>>
>>>          <http://www.perl.org/>
>>>
>>> make[2]: *** [julia/deps/srccache/patchelf-0.9/Makefile.in] Error 1
>>>
>>> make[1]: *** [build/patchelf-0.9/src/patchelf] Error 2
>>>
>>> make: *** [julia-deps] Error 2
>>>
>>> I have automake-1.13 while it looks for automake-1.15.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 20:57:36 UTC+1, Viral Shah wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just a heads up, there is a bug in atlas that causes the linalg/lq test
>>>> to fail (thanks Andreas for finding!). The bugfix is going to be in the
>>>> next atlas release - 3.10.3
>>>>
>>>>  https://sourceforge.net/p/math-atlas/bugs/254/#64f2
>>>>
>>>> Turns out at this moment, both atlas and openblas are not passing
>>>> julia’s tests on power.
>>>>
>>>> -viral
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Jul 20, 2016, at 3:11 PM, James Fairbanks <jpfai...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Updating to master and using that Make.user worked for me.
>>>> >
>>>> > Success!
>>>> > [jpf@power8 julia-dev]$ ./julia
>>>> >                _
>>>> >    _       _ _(_)_     |  A fresh approach to technical computing
>>>> >   (_)     | (_) (_)    |  Documentation: http://docs.julialang.org
>>>> >    _ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "?help" for help.
>>>> >   | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
>>>> >   | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.5.0-dev+5549 (2016-07-20 15:47
>>>> UTC)
>>>> >  _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Commit 80fcb57 (0 days old master)
>>>> > |__/                   |  ppc64le-redhat-linux
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for going through this with me. Hopefully it will be easier
>>>> for the next person.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 10:27:27 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Julia now  builds on master. No longer need to disable threading.
>>>> Make.user for me is now:
>>>> >
>>>> > override USE_SYSTEM_BLAS = 1
>>>> > override LIBBLAS = -L/usr/lib64/atlas -lsatlas
>>>> > override LIBBLASNAME = libsatlas
>>>> > override USE_BLAS64 = 0
>>>> >
>>>> > -viral
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Jul 19, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Viral Shah <vi...@fourthlion.in>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I am testing on CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (AltArch)
>>>> > >
>>>> > > This is the line I am using:
>>>> > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib64/atlas:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Our README says LAPACK >= 3.5, so I suspect the system lapack won’t
>>>> work out. Assuming that symbol is present in the libsatlas file, perhaps
>>>> try also copying it in julia’s usr/lib.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The other thing is to run make again to make sure that all the
>>>> rpath and linking stuff has gone through fine. Or perhaps make cleanall and
>>>> make.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -viral
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> On Jul 19, 2016, at 6:55 PM, James Fairbanks <jpfai...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> For completeness I should say that the julia executable appears
>>>> not to have the libjulia.so correctly linked.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> $ ./julia
>>>> > >> ./julia: symbol lookup error:
>>>> /home/jpf/julia/usr/bin/../lib/liblapack.so: undefined symbol: lsame_
>>>> > >> $ ldd ./julia
>>>> > >>    linux-vdso64.so.1 =>  (0x00003fff9d140000)
>>>> > >>    libjulia.so.0.5 => not found
>>>> > >>    libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00003fff9d100000)
>>>> > >>    librt.so.1 => /lib64/power8/librt.so.1 (0x00003fff9d0d0000)
>>>> > >>    libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/power8/libpthread.so.0
>>>> (0x00003fff9d090000)
>>>> > >>    libc.so.6 => /lib64/power8/libc.so.6 (0x00003fff9ceb0000)
>>>> > >>    /lib64/ld64.so.2 (0x00000000251e0000)
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> $ ldd ./usr/lib/libjulia.so
>>>> > >>    linux-vdso64.so.1 =>  (0x00003fff99680000)
>>>> > >>    libLLVM-3.8.so => /home/jpf/julia/./usr/lib/libLLVM-3.8.so
>>>> (0x00003fff97d80000)
>>>> > >>    libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00003fff97d40000)
>>>> > >>    librt.so.1 => /lib64/power8/librt.so.1 (0x00003fff97d10000)
>>>> > >>    libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/power8/libpthread.so.0
>>>> (0x00003fff97cd0000)
>>>> > >>    libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00003fff97b50000)
>>>> > >>    libm.so.6 => /lib64/power8/libm.so.6 (0x00003fff97a60000)
>>>> > >>    libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00003fff97a20000)
>>>> > >>    libc.so.6 => /lib64/power8/libc.so.6 (0x00003fff97840000)
>>>> > >>    libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00003fff97800000)
>>>> > >>    /lib64/ld64.so.2 (0x0000000035a00000)
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 6:30:34 PM UTC-4, James Fairbanks
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> Adding /usr/lib64/atlas was insufficient so I created a symlink in
>>>> ln -s /usr/lib/atlas/libsatlas.so.3 /usr/lib/atlas/libsatlas.so
>>>> > >> This allowed the build process to complete but leads to an error
>>>> when running the julia executable.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> The error is:
>>>> > >> /home/jpf/julia/usr/bin/julia: symbol lookup error:
>>>> /home/jpf/julia/usr/bin/../lib/liblapack.so: undefined symbol: lsame_
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Is it a good idea to go with the RHEL ppc64le system lapack
>>>> instead of having julia build lapack against system blas?
>>>> > >> I have this version of lapack available from the system.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Available Packages
>>>> > >> Name        : lapack
>>>> > >> Arch        : ppc64le
>>>> > >> Version     : 3.4.2
>>>> > >> Release     : 5.el7
>>>> > >> Size        : 4.9 M
>>>> > >> Repo        : rhel-7-for-power-le-rpms/7Server/ppc64le
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >>  James
>>>> > >> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 4:46:22 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Yes - I forgot to mention that. On the machine I am using, I had
>>>> to add /usr/lib64/atlas or something like that to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I can’t
>>>> login at the moment for some reason, or else I could have retrieved the
>>>> exact line.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> -viral
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 4:12 PM, James Fairbanks <jpfai...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I set it up like you said and got the following error
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> $ make
>>>> > >>> ... a bunch of stuff successfully building ...
>>>> > >>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsatlas
>>>> > >>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>> > >>> make[1]: *** [build/lapack-3.5.0/liblapack.so] Error 1
>>>> > >>> make: *** [julia-deps] Error 2
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Do I need to add something to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the makefile or
>>>> bash environment?
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 3:59:55 PM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
>>>> > >>> There is some old ATLAS stuff in there to build atlas that hasn’t
>>>> been used for a very long time. We are going to delete it. If we find this
>>>> atlas stuff to be generally useful, we can bring it into the Makefile - but
>>>> I definitely don’t want to support a source build.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> override USE_SYSTEM_BLAS = 1
>>>> > >>> override LIBBLAS = -L/usr/lib64/atlas -lsatlas
>>>> > >>> override LIBBLASNAME = libsatlas
>>>> > >>> override USE_BLAS64 = 0
>>>> > >>> override JULIA_THREADS := 0
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Use the vs/ccall-ppc branch that I just pushed, with the above
>>>> Make.user.  Master still doesn’t work.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> -viral
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 3:49 PM, James Fairbanks <jpfai...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> You are overriding the SYSTEM_BLAS with ATLAS. There is a
>>>> USE_ATLAS option. Sould that work?
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> the relevant part from Make.inc is
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> USE_ATLAS := 0
>>>> > >>>> ATLAS_LIBDIR := $(build_libdir)
>>>> > >>>> # or ATLAS_LIBDIR := /path/to/atlas
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 2:07:38 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
>>>> > >>>> The current master now seems to be in good shape for Power, for
>>>> those interested in trying it out. OpenBLAS is still working out a few
>>>> bugs, but in the meanwhile, I was able to successfully link against Atlas
>>>> using the following Make.user:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> override USE_SYSTEM_BLAS = 1
>>>> > >>>> override LIBBLAS = -L/usr/lib64/atlas -lsatlas
>>>> > >>>> override LIBBLASNAME = libsatlas
>>>> > >>>> override USE_BLAS64 = 0
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> Apart from multi-threading, all the other tests passed.
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> -viral
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to