I think some sort of internal hidden uuid appended to module names is going to become necessary for dealing with that, which would need compiler support.
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 9:20:12 AM UTC-7, Andreas Lobinger wrote: > > Hello colleague, > > On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 5:58:28 PM UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Stefan Karpinski <ste...@karpinski.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Compat.jl does this extensively with respect to Julia itself. >> >> >> Another example, just submitted to BinDeps: >> >> https://github.com/JuliaLang/BinDeps.jl/commit/64c591da0cabafc2e319b2ef0dedc18a42d34c95 >> This happens all the time – I don't have a list of all the places off the >> top of my head, however. >> > > i agree. Although i'd put Compat and BinDeps as central points for > attaching to the julia runtime/JIT rather as standard library and therefore > i assume the author(s) to be active on githup... > You also mention naming conflicts between local and published packages in > your 1.0 talk. > So from my perspective more fine-grained dependency resolution (different > environment for different packages, not only a single METAFILE) will > probably show up. > > >
