So happy you made this!
On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 4:25:47 PM UTC, Spencer Russell wrote: > > I'm not planning on merging this functionality into Base.Test. I think > it's nice to keep Base.Test pretty minimal but extensible, and then have > extra functionality provided via packages so they're easier for the > community to iterate on and contribute to. > > -s > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016, at 02:17 AM, mmus wrote: > > Will these improvements make into Base.Test ? > > On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 12:53:37 AM UTC-4, Spencer Russell wrote: > > I think in general the culture in the Julia community is very pro-testing, > which I really appreciate. I saw your post recently about PyTest, but I’m > generally pretty happy with the built-in `@testset` / `@test` system, and > just wanted some lightweight convenience functionality that wouldn’t > require people to restructure their existing tests. > > -s > > > On Oct 29, 2016, at 4:30 AM, pdo...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hey Spencer, > > I like this! > > I have recently started a testing-related package as well, maybe you've > noticed (https://github.com/pdobacz/PyTest.jl). It seems that both > packages could work together and complement quite seamlessly, so I'll > definitely give yours a try. > > BTW, do you think there is much demand for Julia testing tools? > > >
