i've got some time at my hands, let me have a look at the complexity and come back with an estimate. maybe now is the time ;)
regards On 28.06.2011 11:33, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > Hi, > > OpenJUMP does not really support using vendor parameters. The same is true > with STYLES=, SLD_BODY= and SLD= as well. > It is possible to tweak OpenJUMP by giving the server url including the > vendor parameters or extra parameters and telling OpenJUMP to use that URL as > a base URL for GetMaps too. This will not work if WMS server is really using > another base URL for GetMaps but, as we have discussed, that is not very > common. Extra parameters will be used with GetCapabilities as well, but it > does not matter because if WMS server does not understand what they mean it > is just skipping them. This is the behaviour that is also written in the WMS > standard. > > I have never tried if those extra parameters are stored into project file but > I fear they are not. It would be a nice and rather simple development to > OpenJUMP. At least I would guess so, I am not a programmer myself. I would > guess it would basically mean adding a new text box into WMS dialogue and > concatenating the contents of the text box into all the GetMaps, URL-encoded > from the relevant parts. Setting should be separate for each layer, and it > should be possible to save the settings into project file and edit easily. > > With best regards, > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > ________________________________________ > Lähettäjä: Wilfried Hornburg [wilfried.hornb...@gmx.de] > Lähetetty: 28. kesäkuuta 2011 12:13 > Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use > Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] WMS URL for getMap-Request differs from URL for > WMService > > Hi Jukka, > the use of the dialog is OK. Could you please explain how to get your URLs > with vendor specicfic parameters work in OpenJUMP and how it is stored in the > Project-File? > It seems to be a little bit tricky. Thanks. > > Wilfried > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:11:33 +0000 >> Von: Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> >> An: \'OpenJump develop and use\' <jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> Betreff: Re: [JPP-Devel] WMS URL for getMap-Request differs from URL for >> WMService > >> Hi, >> >> I forgot the URL for testing the vendor parameters (which are OK according >> to the WMS standard). This one can be tested with a web browser >> >> http://188.64.1.61/cgi-bin/mapserv?map=/usr/map/osm-mapserver_i.map&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&WIDTH=1059&HEIGHT=687&LAYERS=sea,borders,POI_free_query&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&BBOX=-574187,6558020,1615375,7978444&SRS=EPSG:3067&STYLES=&tag=shop&value=supermarket >> >> When using &value=convenience the map will look different. As long as >> OpenJUMP is missing the setting for vendor parameters the only way to use >> them >> is to tweak with the base URL. Automatic GetMap URL taken from >> GetCapabilities would break this useful possibility. >> >> -Jukka Rahkonen- >> >> >> -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- >> Lähettäjä: Wilfried Hornburg [mailto:wilfried.hornb...@gmx.de] >> Lähetetty: 28. kesäkuuta 2011 0:37 >> Vastaanottaja: jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Aihe: [JPP-Devel] WMS URL for getMap-Request differs from URL for >> WMService >> >> Hi, >> the Info Jukka explained in his >> Posthttps://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27709358 to >> different URLs for an WMS is generally OK. >> The only suggestion i'd like to discuss is, whether the user has really >> the choice to accept (or cancel) the differing URLs (getCap and getMap) >> The differing URLs are indeed a special case. But: If the Web Mapping >> Server answers with the getCapabilities Response and declares an >> different getMapURL, then this URL is mandatory to get an >> getMap-Response with an Mapimage in it. If you'll send the >> getMap-Request with the URL for the Service, then an WMS will respond >> with an empty Mapimage (no Error). The Problem is that you don't know >> for this request whether there is an Information or not. >> As far as i can see, it is not necessary to ask the user. The answer >> from the question is never stored in the project file. So if you've >> stored a project, you'll get no question anymore. >> I am interested in your opinion. >> >> Wilfried >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. >> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security >> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 >> _______________________________________________ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
