On 17.09.2011 15:23, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > Hi, > > I have been testing with the nightly one since yesterday morning. > > With my Vista no combination shows ECW image with jre 1.6.0_27 or 1.7.0. > GvSIG binaries 1.10 and 1.11 do work if I have jre 1.6.0_23. I have not > tried with 1.6.0 updates 24, 24 or 26.
what was the exact error? do you say 1.10,1.11 did not work for you reliably with vista and jdks 1.6 & 7? > The ermapper.jar + "original" ecw-dlls are working OK with all Java versions > I have tried both on XP and Vista. The speed is good. I remember there was > some trouble with zooming outside the edge of the ECW image area but right > now I could not repeat that error. this is really a reason to keep them. true. as far as i understand the new 0.0.7 adds some sort of compressed ecw support and is faster. but i can't judge that. > I think that we should have a really good reason for taking the new jecw.jar > system as a standard for Windows delivery if it brings together the nasty > operating system - jre version - dll version dependency. it starts with linux, because we cannot have ermapper.jar & jecw-0.0.7.jar both in libs. they contain conflicting class definitions, so we would have to route that as well. i'd argue we should give oj users to read ecw files. >It is practically impossible for normal users to get and install old jre >versions. I believe it is only possible through the Oracle Technology Network >after creating an account, and installing the exe file requires Windows admin >rights. since sun was oracled it is not that easy to find anymore but still there for everybody e.g. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javasebusiness/downloads/java-archive-downloads-javase5-419410.html find this under http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html click 'previous releases' on top, on the following page find 'Archived releases' because oracle changes the pages so much i usually google 'java jdk' or 'java se' and the correct downloads page is found. i hear that it does not work for you but i am sure we are on the right way. i am also sure that there are no java version issues here, except of jdk5 does not show any problems. during my tests all java 6/7 behaved identical. i will test on vista32/64 here and come back with results. ede > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > ________________________________________ > Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [edgar.sol...@web.de] > > >> my current conclusion is that we can assume >> 1.09 works reliably with XP >> 1.10/11 reliably on Win7 (i assume also on Vista, will have to test though) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
