On 28.07.2017 17:06, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed with a dataset having 1.2 million features with lots of attributes > that OpenJUMP is rather slow in parsing its own native JML format. It takes > about 30 minutes to open the file. Shapefiles are much faster but they do not > suit me because long strings are truncated. Can the hardcore developers guess > what is the bottle neck with JML/XML parsing and if there could be some place > for improvements? >
hi Jukka, could you provide said dataset privately? does it make a difference when you cut down the number of attributes? ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
