Does anyone know if uDig is pursuing this goal?  See this article about
Eclipse: http://www.pikesoft.com/blog/index.php?itemid=115

Larry

On 10/3/07, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Larry,
>
> You are probably correct. I'll try to contain my enthusiasm.:]
>
> If at some point we decide it is possible and some of our programmers
> want to pursue funded work I'll try to follow up with my contacts in
> the industry here in the United States.
>
> The Sunburned Surveyor
>
> On 10/3/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @stefan,
> >
> >    The Java ME SDK comes with a great mobile platform emulator that can
> be
> > used for test and development.  JAI isn't really necessary, and uses too
> > many resources anyway.  Real devices to test with are easy to come by
> > lately, but we would need to target a specific level of device in order
> to
> > know what assumptions to make.  What are people running ArcPAD on?
> >
> > @Sunburned,
> >
> >   I think it would be best to get a little further along in
> investigating
> > the feasibility before involving commercial interests.
> >
> > regards,
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > On 10/3/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would vote for MobileJUMP ;)
> > >
> > > but I also had a short discussion with a colleague. He told me that
> > > classes as java util were missing in ME 2 years ago. So it may be a
> bit
> > > more complicate. (I think 1.5 stuff needs also to be droped and nobody
> > > nows if jai is running)
> > > Seems like one would need a student project on that? amd more
> important
> > > ... a device to check ;)
> > >
> > > stefan
> > >
> > > Larry Becker wrote:
> > >
> > > > To avoid forking the code further, we could just make a new
> > > > Configuration file and a new build file.  I think ME applications
> have
> > > > to be built with NetBeans.
> > > >
> > > > We need a name.  I think we can avoid "Jump ME" for the obvious
> > > > reason.  Something like MiniJUMP, or MobileJUMP, or (more obscure)
> > > > Demitasse.
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > > On 10/3/07, *Stefan Steiniger* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     mhm..
> > > >
> > > >     after Arnd outlines the "use cases" i would rather say that a
> > skilled
> > > >     programmer (which I am not) can do this things in about 4 weeks
> > > >     (fulltime). It is basically restructuring the GUI (workbench) as
> > > >     most of
> > > >     the desired functionality is available from existing plugins.
> > > >     my guess
> > > >
> > > >     stefan
> > > >
> > > >     Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> > > >
> > > >     >OpenJUMP on Java ME sounds cool, but I agree with Larry...it
> sounds
> > > >     >like a pretty monster task.
> > > >     >
> > > >     >Still, a lot of OpenJUMP's functionality is added to the core
> as a
> > > >     >plug-in in the JUMPConfiguration class. I suppose someone could
> > start
> > > >     >by unplugging things there.
> > > >     >
> > > >     >The Sunburned Surveyor
> > > >     >
> > > >     >On 10/2/07, Hisaji ONO < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >     >>Thank you for response.
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >> By the way, can JTS be built on latest Java ME
> > > >     >>environment?
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >> Regards.
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >>_______________________________________________
> > > >     >>jump-users mailing list
> > > >     >> [email protected]
> > > >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > >
> > >>http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >>
> > > >     >_______________________________________________
> > > >     >jump-users mailing list
> > > >     > [email protected]
> > > >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > >     >
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > >
> > <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users>
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >     >
> > > >
> > > >     _______________________________________________
> > > >     jump-users mailing list
> > > >     [email protected]
> > > >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > >
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >jump-users mailing list
> > > >[email protected]
> > > >
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jump-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > jump-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> jump-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users
>



-- 
http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
jump-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/jump-users

Reply via email to