* Paul Carter: > However, on the Junipers I am unable to do this. Is this possible, if so > how would I go about configuring this?
It's possible (in the sense that the configuration is accepted) to make the whole interface unnumbered. Then you can route prefixes to the interface (and not to a next hop). But even though this is documented, the router (also J-series in my cases) begins to behave erratically when encountering this configuration. (I don't think the performance concern is valid. There needs to be an ARP entry somewhere, an interface route only changes where it is kept. Large prefixes may create problems, but this is similar to what happens with a large directly connected subnet.) -- Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
