1. Laziness 2. Not seeing any problems, therefore thinking all is good 3. As you said the "it was like that when I got here and nobody asked me to change it" 4. I saw a configuration on Google once that did this, and it seemed like a good idea
Or some combination of the above. :) Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Cisco to Juniper Question > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Cisco to Juniper Question > > (why do people do this, again and again? ...) > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I ask this of myself all the time. For a point-to-point /30, I suppose it's not really a problem. I imagine that the reason a lot of people do this is because "it was like that when I got here". Either that, or some like the benefit of a lower admin distance, as I believe that a static route to next-hop has a distance of 1 in Cisco routers, whereas a static route to an interface is 0. That said, I think it's the former. :-) -evt _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
