I would expect it to work. Never tried it, and dunno if it'd be common practice, but lo0 is largely just an interface, and just as have 2 customers come in across a tagged Gig trunk to be dumped into separate VRFs should work, so too should the same IP in diff logical units on lo0. Only 1 way to find out for sure though! (commit check)
David On 19/11/2008, cp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone see a problem or have any experiences with using the same > loopback unit 0 IP addresses for other loopback unit in VRFs? Is this a > common practice? For example, loopback unit 0 is 172.16.1.1/32 and > lives in inet.0. loopback 425 is 172.16.1.1/32 lives in a vrf. > > > > -Chip > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
