On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:44 PM, David Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would expect it to work. Never tried it, and dunno if it'd be > common practice, but lo0 is largely just an interface, and just as > have 2 customers come in across a tagged Gig trunk to be dumped into > separate VRFs should work, so too should the same IP in diff logical > units on lo0. Only 1 way to find out for sure though! (commit check) > > David You can do this, but you would want to ensure that each logical interface is in a different instance. For example, lo0.0 in the master instance, lo0.1 (assuming the same IP address) should be in a different instance. > > > > On 19/11/2008, cp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone see a problem or have any experiences with using the same > > loopback unit 0 IP addresses for other loopback unit in VRFs? Is this a > > common practice? For example, loopback unit 0 is 172.16.1.1/32 and > > lives in inet.0. loopback 425 is 172.16.1.1/32 lives in a vrf. > > > > > > > > -Chip > That will absolutely work and is needed in certain corner cases. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
