hello , this is a geat thing for congestion simulation. is there any juniper document confirming this ?
thank you. > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:24:50 +0530 > From: ragha...@juniper.net > To: merye...@hotmail.com; tru...@suspicious.org > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Yes, it's valid for logical sub-interface also. > > You can apply the shaping rate on logical interface, and offer the > traffic load greater than the shaping rate to create congestion. > > Of course, the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be > calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate. > > Thanks, > Raghu > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of meryem Z > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 4:42 PM > To: tru...@suspicious.org > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface > > > Hello , > > Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical > sub-interface ? > does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will > be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ? > > thank you. > > > > > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface > > From: tru...@suspicious.org > > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:40:00 +1100 > > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > To: merye...@hotmail.com > > > > Scheduling on an interface with a shaping rate that is less than the > physical line rate artificially creates congestion when an offered > traffic load is greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps > scheduler and you offer 5.01Mbps you will see queuing... > > > > > > On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, meryem Z wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello community, > > > > > > i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i > need to simulate Congestion conditions. > > > The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without > impacting the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth > limit for the sub-interface? > > > > > > > > > thank you. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam > performante de Microsoft > > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante > de Microsoft > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail : une messagerie fiable avec la protection anti-spam performante de Microsoft https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
