On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:57:55AM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Both MTUs are consistent and always have been. I started out with > 9216 physical MTU and 1500 inet MTU, but have since just deleted the > custom MTU and went with the defaults. I am quite sure now that > this is not an MTU issue, but rather a deficiency with the EX2500. > I've opened up a JTAC case and will let the list know what the > problem turns out to be.
But you didn't have the iso mtu set. Which means iso was probably using 9216-6-6-4-2-3 = 9195 (or 9192-6-6-4-2-3 = 9171) by default for a VLAN encapsulated 802.2 LLC frame. Changing the inet MTU doesn't affect any non-IP protocols' MTUs. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp