On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:38:41PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > Richard's suggestion to consider the MX80 is a good idea, > especially if you're looking at having two for redundancy. > My main concern is JUNOS 10.x, especially since you're > somewhat new to Juniper. But if you can hang in there, the > code will improve with time. The MX80 is definitely great > for peering... it's a role we're considering for it here, > since it's too pricey to stick in the metro :-).
Eh... Given his incredibly simple sounding config, personally I'd just just get the Trio/MX80 cards and call it a better long term investment. Depending on your exact config they're somewhere between a little and a lot cheaper than the old DPCs, and they integrate a lot of the things that you previously needed services DPCs for too. Now if only they'd fix the damn BGP bugs, we're seeing 4-5 minute stalls from flapping a single IBGP session in 10.1 tests. -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp