On Thursday, July 22, 2010 05:12:08 pm Pavel Lunin wrote: > But imho running things like full BGP,
Yes. > tons of IFLs with > queues, Skip that. > thousands of IGP routes, Yes. > label forwarding > states, Skip that. > etc Maybe > on J series is a little bit strange sort of > network design :) Upto 1Gbps performance (has anyone > tested how 300k prefixes in FIB affect forwarding > performance of J?) and things like this — you really > need it? Route reflector. > If you believe you really need this, why not to > stay at old good 9.3 packet-based JUNOS? Because it won't have some of the features only available in later code, which - wait for it - is ES-only. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
