Found it .. sorry folks - there was a document on their site that explained limitations on 10.2 and IPv6 clustered WAS listed there as not implemented. Now I find new information at
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/releases/10-2/#security IPv6 Release 10.2 adds several new IPv6 capabilities to SRX and J Series devices, including support for: * Address books and address set entries that contain any combination of IPv4 addresses, IPv6 addresses, and Domain Name System (DNS) names * Chassis clusters in active-passive (failover) deployments * Using IPv6 DiffServ code points in class of service (CoS) classifier rules and re-write rules * Flow-based processing, which enables SRX and J Series security features to process IPv6 traffic * The ability to configure a logical interface with an IPv4 address, and IPv6 address or both Any feedback on those folks who have deployed it and have it working is appreciated.... customer is a bit concerned about cost - I'm just concerned about it actually working properly ;) Cheers, Paul -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:39 PM To: 'Crist Clark'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6 Hmmm.. interesting - I thought I had reviewed 10.2 for this support... will dig deeper. So then comes the question - anyone actually *using* IPv6 on clustered SRX? Any real-world feedback? I have an SRX210H at home and recently discovered an annoying "bug" that IPv6 isn't supported on VLAN interfaces... that was kind of a shock to be blunt.. Thanks, Paul -----Original Message----- From: Crist Clark [mailto:crist.cl...@globalstar.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:22 PM To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6 I just happened to be looking at the 10.2 release notes after seeing your email. "IPv6 Support [snip] * Chassis cluster—In JUNOS Release 10.2, we support chassis cluster in an active-passive (failover) deployment. [Junos OS Security Configuration Guide]" You may want to have a closer look at the 10.2 documentation (the current recommended release for SRXs). I am not using this feature so I have no personal experience whether it actually works. On 11/2/2010 at 10:43 AM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > Hi there. > > > > We are looking to bring on an additional SRX650 at a site by clustering. > One of the requirements though is IPv6 traffic and it appears it's not > supported? > > > > From > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-c > ollections/release-notes/10/topic-39007.html : > > > > Chassis Cluster > > On SRX Series and J Series devices, the following features are not supported > when chassis clustering is enabled on the device: > > * All packet-based protocols, such as MPLS, Connectionless Network > Service (CLNS), and IP version 6 (IPv6) > > > > > > > > Do any of the SRX boxes support clustering with IPv6? Is there any timeline > on this being fixed that anyone knows of? > > > > Our goal is redundant routing engines should something happen - makes more > $$$ sense to add an additional SRX650 when there is one existing.. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Crist Clark Network Security Specialist, Information Systems Globalstar 408 933 4387 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
