Do you have an intrazone policy? Trust to trust, allow all for example. Sent from my iPad
On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:04 PM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > Thanks... yeah, pretty much. > > We installed the static route and were unable to reach anything on the > 172.30.200.0/24 network from a machine in the 192.168.20.0/24 subnet. On > that actual machine (Windows 7) we installed a route in Windows and were > able to communicate no problem (bypassing the route statement on the SRX). > > This seems to imply that by using a default route you can't take traffic > into an interface and route it back out the SAME interface - an issue we > used to face on the Cisco PIX boxes at one time. > > Looking for a workaround to this - our solution at this point is to bring > the 192.168.20.121 device (which is a VPN appliance that connects us to our > billing platforms) in via a subnet on a directly connected interface. The > downside to this is that it involves some routing changes on the VPN portion > which we're trying to avoid as it involves a third party. > > Literally on the Cisco 2800 in place it's "ip route 172.30.200.0 > 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.121". On the SRX we have "set routing-options > static route 172.30.200.0/24 next-hop 192.168.20.121". > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Damkot [mailto:mdamkot...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:55 PM > To: Paul Stewart > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Static Routing - SRX > > Paul- > > Just to make sure I'm tracking correctly, you've tried installing a static > route and it didn't work? > > > On Nov 3, 2010, at 11:48 , Paul Stewart wrote: > >> Hi there. >> >> >> >> Can anyone give any suggestion/guidance on the following. >> >> >> >> I'm trying to do a static route *out* the same interface that the traffic >> came *in* on. This is on an SRX-240 >> >> >> >> Here are the details: >> >> "Private": 192.168.20.0/24 >> >> "Public": 216.168.x.x/32 >> >> >> >> Static route: 172.30.200.0/24 to <gateway - 192.168.20.224> to >> 192.168.20.121 >> >> >> >> 192.168.20.121 is the IP on a VPN appliance. >> >> >> >> Traffic from a client computer never gets routed to the VPN appliance. > This >> works on a Cisco 2800 without a problem, but I can't get it working on the >> SRX. >> >> >> >> So, to walk this through a bit more - a computer sitting on the > 192.168.20.0 >> subnet has a default gateway of 192.168.20.224. We want a route on the > SRX >> that routes any traffic coming into 192.168.20.224 that is destined to >> 172.30.200.0/24 to be sent to 192.168.20.121. In Cisco 2800 it's just a >> static route. >> >> >> >> Ran across this challenge in the Cisco PIX world as well.. >> >> >> >> Thanks for any input.. >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp