Hi Giovanni,
Here I have 3 virtual-chassis 2xEX4200. Two of them used as access L2
switches, and the last one as L3 border CE (it´s running 4
rouing-instances against 4 VRF with OSPF, 2 LAGs, variuos RVIs and
Filter-Based-Forwardig to accomplish a specific cistomer requirement).
Here there is JUNOS 10.1R1.8 in all switches. In the standar L2 and L3
features I didn,t see any issue. I had some problem configuring FBF, but
not sure if depending on JUNOS version (releases notes had no reference
to that, and I coudn´t continue with the tests).
One switch recently was turned off and couldn't boot any more: I found
that same problem in the experiences of others in the forums, and it was
solved by a recovery with TFTP method and formatting internel media, so
I guess it is not a JUNOS version issue.
Hope it helps.
Cristian
El 19/02/2011 13:13, Giovanni Bellac escribió:
Hello all
I have now spend a lot of time to find out the optimal version of JunOS for our
newly ordered 2x EX4200s.
1) We will run a 2x EX4200 Virtual Chassis.
2) We will run BGP default routes (NO full table) and announce our /21.
3) We will connect our rack-switches to the Virtual Chassis.
So, we will do Layer2 and some (basic) Layer3.
Should we use the latest service release of 10.0 (= 10.0s11 / 10.0s12) or use
directly 10.4R2.6 ?
My eyes are on 10.0 and 10.4 because these are longer supported releases.
Thank you in advance.
Regards
Giovanni
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
