Just an FYI, because I've seen this bite people before (not specific to your question)... software upgrades on EX4200 VCs are NOT hitless - the whole VC is down for the duration of the upgrade (sometimes 15+ mins). VC != redundancy/HA, VC = less switches to manage.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Giovanni Bellac <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello all > > I have now spend a lot of time to find out the optimal version of JunOS for > our > newly ordered 2x EX4200s. > > 1) We will run a 2x EX4200 Virtual Chassis. > 2) We will run BGP default routes (NO full table) and announce our /21. > 3) We will connect our rack-switches to the Virtual Chassis. > > So, we will do Layer2 and some (basic) Layer3. > > Should we use the latest service release of 10.0 (= 10.0s11 / 10.0s12) or > use > directly 10.4R2.6 ? > > My eyes are on 10.0 and 10.4 because these are longer supported releases. > > Thank you in advance. > > Regards > Giovanni > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
