On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Bill Blackford wrote:
I would also add that the MX isn't a switch in the sense that it's not the best choice for campus/core applications. It doesn't do traditional VLANS, RVI/SVI (bridge-domains/IRB instread). It also boasts a variety of advanced layer2 features not seen or really required in a campus environment. The MX is a router and probably more on par with the ASR9K.or the aging GSR.
I would agree with this. We're looking at replacing our border routers in the near future, and it's between ASR9Ks and MX480s at this point. I definitely wouldn't put either one in our wiring closets to provide direct access to end-users.
jms _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
