On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:23:59AM +0200, Delian Delchev wrote: > You may mistakenly assume that EX8200 is equivalent to 65xx, and it > is, in size. But against 65xx and 76xx the more correct juniper > product should be the MX.
Not really. The best direct comparison to the EX8200 is the Nexus 7k line, but 6500/7600s with LAN cards are at least a pretty close runner up (trading in some higher bandwidths and lower prices per port for a more mature platform with some features that haven't been written for EX8200 or N7K yet). Comparing 6500/7600 to MX is pretty apples to oranges, especially if you aren't talking about a 7600 stuffed full of expensive ES/SIP cards. You've really gotta get into ASR9k before you can even start to make a comparison to MX in most categories, which is no big shock considering ASR9k was made specifically to compete against the MX. -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp