On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:28 AM, <jbues...@jb-internetworking.com> wrote:
> Hi there, > > I have the following issue: > > switch1--(ciscoPE)-----(MX80)----switch2 > ----switch3 > > Switch1 is connected to a Cisco PE > Switch2 and switch 2 are connected to a MX80 in the same bridge domain. > > The bridge-domain is configured in the virtual-switch and VPLS is > activated. > > Now the problem is, previously when I did not needed bridging for VPLS > (and this virtual-switches) I had enabled the command "vlan-id none" under > the VPLS routing-instance. > > This command ensures that packets send over the VPLS cloud have their > vlan-tag removed.This ensures interop with Cisco. > > You shouldn't need to remove the vlan tag for interop with cisco. Ethernet, 802.1q and q-in-q are all standards based. Also, I don't think this command strips vlan tags. I think it configures the juniper to ignore them on ingress. > Now with virtual switches this command is not supported. This means that > the switches behind the MX have connectiviy but not towards the switch > behind the Cisco PE. > What happens when you trunk the port on the cisco and actually send an receive frames in vlan 500? Also what does the cisco side say? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
