I wonder if you had the frame egress a trunk if you would see it dual tagged with 100/100, the expected outer-tag TPID, and the 0x8100 on the inner tag...
Derick Winkworth CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721 http://blinking-network.blogspot.com --- On Thu, 7/28/11, David Ball <davidtb...@gmail.com> wrote: From: David Ball <davidtb...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] tag-protocol-id matching in vlan-tags To: "Addy Mathur" <addy.mat...@gmail.com> Cc: "Juniper-Nsp" <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 10:27 AM Ah, so I'm potentially not crazy (at least not for this reason). See below, and thanks... David --- JUNOS 10.0R3.10 built 2010-04-16 07:14:00 UTC {master} me@router> show interfaces ge-1/1/0 Physical interface: ge-1/1/0, Enabled, Physical link is Up Interface index: 173, SNMP ifIndex: 250 Link-level type: 52, MTU: 9192, Speed: 1000mbps, BPDU Error: None, MAC-REWRITE Error: None, Loopback: Disabled, Source filtering: Disabled, Flow control: Disabled, Auto-negotiation: Disabled, Remote fault: Online, Speed-negotiation: Disabled, Auto-MDIX: Enabled Device flags : Present Running Interface flags: SNMP-Traps Internal: 0x4000 CoS queues : 8 supported, 8 maximum usable queues Current address: 00:22:83:75:69:9c, Hardware address: 00:22:83:75:69:9c Last flapped : 2011-07-26 15:43:39 MDT (1d 17:08 ago) Input rate : 978417760 bps (96149 pps) Output rate : 988075168 bps (96491 pps) Active alarms : None Active defects : None Logical interface ge-1/1/0.100 (Index 113) (SNMP ifIndex 170) Description: 0x88A8 TPID test Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x88a8.100 ] In(pop) Out(push 0x88a8.100) Encapsulation: VLAN-CCC Input packets : 14161344641 Output packets: 14161304171 Protocol ccc, MTU: 9192 Logical interface ge-1/1/0.32767 (Index 114) (SNMP ifIndex 171) Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4004000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x0000.0 ] Encapsulation: ENET2 Input packets : 0 Output packets: 0 Protocol multiservice, MTU: Unlimited Flags: None {master} me@router> On 28 July 2011 04:54, Addy Mathur <addy.mat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 27, 2011, David Ball <davidtb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> MX running 10.0 (DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE for int in question) >> >> Should I expect that a logical unit configured with 'vlan-tags outer >> 0x88A8.100' would also permit frames using TPID 8100 and VLAN ID 100 ? >> I kinda expected not (since it doesn't 'match'), yet if I change my >> test set to send normal 0x8100.100 frames, they're still accepted by >> the interface (config below) and stuffed into the associated VPN. >> >> [edit interfaces ge-1/1/0] >> flexible-vlan-tagging; >> encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services; >> gig-ether-options { >> no-auto-negotiation; >> ethernet-switch-profile { >> tag-protocol-id 0x88A8; >> } >> } >> unit 100 { >> encapsulation vlan-ccc; >> vlan-tags outer 0x88A8.100; >> input-vlan-map pop; >> output-vlan-map push; >> } >> >> Are my expectations that "specifying the TPID in the vlan-tags >> statement would ONLY match frames with that TPID" wrong? Practice >> would indicate that I'm wrong, but I guess I'm wondering if this is >> expected behaviour. > > David: I don't believe your expectation is incorrect. Could you please post > the exact JUNOS release (including minor version) and the output of "show > interface ge-1/1/0"? > >> >> TIA, >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp