On (2012-04-13 15:20 +0800), Xu Hu wrote: > Recently heard so many times about CGN, but i still don't understand what > is the difference between NAT and CGN, can any expert explain what's the > CGN.
That is good question :). I think it's just marketing for doing NAT in very high scale, regardless how the NAT is done. Usually with CGN it is implied that you are addressing problem of address exhaustion. And when ever it is 1-to-1, trio should be able to do it technically, but n-to-1 isn't going to fly without additional hardware. EVen IPv6 to IPV4 I think should be doable in Trio, like when IPv6 DADDR has embedded IPV4 address of IPV4 only host, I think that could be implementable in trio. But never buy anything, if you can't deploy it today, in long-term supported software release. Otherwise consider feature non-existing. Which is the case for CGN and MX5. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp