Hi Diogo I have not checked that yet but what I did check was that PE2/RR is advertising the route via BGP to PE4 and PE4 is not accepting it. Right now I do not have access to the setup.
Please suggest where can be the issue and what more to check apart from the one you mentioned and I will check and revert in sometime. Regards Varma On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Diogo Montagner <diogo.montag...@gmail.com> wrote: > What happens if you do a ping mpls ldp from PE4-lo0 to PE1-lo0 ? > > On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear All >> >> I was testing a setup whereby I am using mix of LDP and RSVP in the >> backbone for transporting MPLS VPN Traffic. The setup is something as >> below: >> >> CE1--PE1------PE2/RR-------PE3----PE4------CE2 >> >> Now we have a limitation that we can only run LDP between PE4 and PE3. >> From PE3 to PE2/RR we have RSVP. From PE3 to PE1 we have LDP Tunneling >> over RSVP. >> >> Now the routes of CE1 are not getting installed into the VRF Table on >> PE4. When checked the inet.3 table I do not see the route for PE2/RR >> Loopback but only PE1 and PE3. >> I tried to add a default static into inet.3 or importing the inet.0 >> rib to inet.3 on PE4 but still am not seeing routes. >> >> I think the issue is that the BGP Next Hop is not in inet.3 for >> PE2/RR. How can I achieve to make this setup working apart from >> running LDP Tunneling over RSVP between PE4& PE2/RR or between PE3 & >> PE2/RR. >> >> -- >> Regards >> Vaibhava Varma >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > ./diogo -montagner > JNCIE-M 0x41A -- Regards Vaibhava Varma _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp