Hello. Yes and no. Yes, but befor using Trio Chipset, No because now for example MX480 system capacity is 1.92 Tbps. If I am wrong, please correct me.
2012/8/8 Xu Hu <jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com> > Is any reason juniper choose the 5 for mx5, 40 for mx40, 480 for mx480? > The number is for backplane bandwidth? > > Thanks and regards, > Xu Hu > > On 8 Aug, 2012, at 5:30, Doug Hanks <dha...@juniper.net> wrote: > > > Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a > > license to a full MX80 as well. > > > > > > On 8/7/12 1:56 AM, "Tima Maryin" <timamar...@mail.ru> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> have a look at: > >> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html > >> > >> > >> and the whole thread: > >> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023068.html > >> > >> > >> They are about mx480 vs ASR9006, but most of stuff still applies. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 07.08.2012 10:22, William Jackson wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being prompted to > >>> look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any people have operational > >>> experience with the ASR9001 platform? > >>> Or any thoughts on comparison. > >>> > >>> These will be used for IPv4/IPv6 eBGP transit and for MPLS L2VPN/VPLS > >>> drop offs, thus all the VLAN tagging, rewriting shenanigans!! > >>> > >>> thanks > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
