On (2012-08-15 00:21 -0700), Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > My thing was more along the lines that routing (RIB) / next-hop path > information ought to be learned and/or monitored over protocols that > ride that same path, so that any path failures are detected and routed > around.
In static route they are also, ARP timeout in JunOS is 20min by default, so it'll just take quite long time to invalidate the static route (short of bugs like the OP sees) Cisco has 4h, which is absolutely ridiculous. Linux uses 1min, which is better than default BGP holdtime in Cisco or Juniper. So statically routed Linux would converge faster than BGP routed Juniper in sudden disappearance of peer. Of course both ARP timeout and BGP holdtime are tunable as well as either BGP or static could run BFD. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
