Hi Moki,

No worries; this is the exact challenge that faced my customer. Their
server was on the management subnet which was only connected to the routers
via the management interfaces. I'm not sure what they did to resolve it; I
would presume that they moved the server.

Sorry that I don't have a better solution for you.
Graham

On Friday, September 7, 2012, moki wrote:

> Thank you Graham,
> I suspected that this is the case ...
> Is there another way to overcome this problem ?
> Because our netflow server connected to OOB management network which is
> routed only via Fxp interface ...
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Graham Brown 
> <juniper-...@grahambrown.info<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 
> 'juniper-...@grahambrown.info');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Moki,
>>
>> The export of flow data is not supported via an fxp interface. The fxp0
>> interface does not have the hardware capabilities to handle this kind of
>> operation.
>>
>> I had a similar customer query a while back; they could configure the
>> export of flows via the fxp interface, however it never worked.
>>
>> I hope that this is of help,
>> Graham
>> --
>> Graham Brown
>> Twitter - @mountainrescuer <https://twitter.com/#!/mountainrescuer>
>> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamcbrown>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, moki <vom...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 
>> 'cvml', 'vom...@gmail.com');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>> Does anyone know if inline-jflow support to send traffic via fxp
>>> interface.
>>> I tried to configure inline-jflow with the configuration bellow when the
>>> route to the destination is the fxp interface:
>>> family inet {
>>>                 output {
>>>                     flow-server 88.88.88.1 {<-- routed via fxp
>>>                         port 2055;
>>>                         autonomous-system-type origin;
>>>                         version-ipfix {
>>>                             template {
>>>                                 default-temp;
>>>                             }
>>>                         }
>>>                     }
>>>                     inline-jflow {
>>>                         source-address 88.88.88.2;
>>>                     }
>>>                 }
>>>
>>> Is it possible ?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net <javascript:_e({},
>>> 'cvml', 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net');>
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
-sent from my iPad; please excuse spelling, grammar and brevity-
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to